Showing posts with label Bank Accounts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bank Accounts. Show all posts

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Hackers hit bank. Is your money safe anywhere?


NEW YORK — Hackers stole personal information from millions of JPMorgan Chase customers this summer, in one of the biggest breaches of a financial company.

The bank says only non-financial data was taken — names, addresses, telephone numbers and email. But that’s still a lot, and experts warn that customers need to be vigilant about identity theft in the next several months.

The theft — involving 76 million households and seven million small businesses — raises questions about the safety of personal information, especially at banks. What risks do people face? Will this keep happening? And can bank customers reduce the threat of identity or financial theft?

Q: How concerned should I be if the hackers didn’t get Social Security numbers, bank account or credit card information?

A: We may not yet know the full scope of what the hackers were able to steal, says Eric Chiu, president of HyTrust, a cloud security company based in Mountain View, Ca. “They can sit on your network for months, siphoning off data before being detected,” says Chiu. He says that customers’ addresses and phone numbers could be used or sold to others who might combine that information with other stolen data. It could then be used to access accounts or even to open new accounts in the unwitting customers’ names.

Q: How close did the hackers get to stealing customers’ money or more sensitive financial data?

A: We don’t really know. The hackers may not have been looking to siphon funds, says Chiu because “data is what’s gold now.” Other security experts say the bank’s public statements suggest that its defenses were partly successful, because hackers weren’t able to get other information.

Q: So is this a partial win for the bank?

A: It might be, says Mike Lloyd, chief technology officer at Sunnyvale, Ca.-based RedSeal Networks. But the bank shouldn’t declare victory — especially since cybersecurity is “a never-ending war” against new and evolving threats.

Q: What else could happen?

A: One concern is that this breach was a reconnaissance mission in preparation for a bigger hack, says Craig Carpenter, chief strategist at AccessData, a cybersecurity firm. “They don’t have to crack the entire system tomorrow,” he says. “They could have simply been mining for data, or looking to leave something behind that would allow them to get into (JPMorgan’s servers) easier next time.”

Q: What else should banks do to protect customer data?

A: The financial industry is already doing more than other industries, says Dwayne Melancon, chief technology officer for the cybersecurity firm Tripwire, in Portland, Oregon. Chase in particular is known for using advanced security technology, says Avivah Litan, an analyst with Gartner, a technology research firm based in Stamford, Connecticut. But she also says that most companies have trouble keeping up with constant threats, and one big vulnerability lies with employees. While businesses tend to spend more on defending against outside attacks, many hacks begin with a compromised employee account. Litan says companies must do more to screen workers and also train them in security precautions.

Q: Should I close my account at JPMorgan?

A: At this point, there’s no indication that’s necessary. Steve Weisman, a Boston attorney and author of several books and articles about identity theft says, “it won’t do any good” because other banks may be equally vulnerable to hacking. “There’s no place to run and hide. You should monitor your account regularly and don’t trust any communications you receive.”

Q: After big attacks against retail chains and now Chase, should we expect more breaches?

A: The size and scope of the breaches are going to get worse, not better. Target, Home Depot and JPMorgan Chase are just the beginning, says Darren Hayes, a professor and expert in cybersecurity at Pace University in New York. It’s safe to presume that hackers have been sitting inside these banks and business networks for months, even years, sometimes not doing anything. “Hackers these days are patient … and are extremely effective at just gathering a lot of data over time.”

Q: Is there any way to protect myself if they’re this sophisticated?

A: Change your passwords regularly, don’t click on links in suspicious emails, they could be phishing attempts by scammers, and check online statements for charges you don’t recognize. Be wary of calls requesting personal information.

Q: How bad is the fallout so far?

A: The New York-based bank says there’s no evidence of financial fraud associated with the breach.

source: buiness.inquirer.net

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Court of Appeals freezes accounts of Brit's wife in £750-million scam

MANILA, Philippines - The Court of Appeals (CA) has frozen the bank accounts of the Filipino wife of a British national who is facing charges involving a 750-million-pound (around P50 billion) fraud scam in the United Kingdom.

In a resolution released last Monday, the fourth division of the appellate court ordered Philippine Savings Bank and Standard Chartered Bank to immediately freeze the accounts under the name of Ruth Ramos Ochavez for 20 days.

Associate Justices Juan Enriquez Jr. and Manuel Barrios concurred with the ruling penned by Associate Justice Apolinario Bruselas Jr.

The CA issued the freeze order to avoid the possibility of funds being withdrawn, removed, transferred, concealed, and placed beyond the reach of Philippine law enforcers.

The order was sought in an ex-parte petition filed by the Philippines’ anti-money laundering agency.

On Aug. 11, 2011, the Department of Justice coordinated with the Anti-Money Laundering Council after it received a request of assistance from the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) of the government of the UK, coursed through the UK Judicial Cooperation Unit.

The request was made on the basis of the good international relations between the Philippines and the UK, and their common interest against criminality.

The British government had conducted an investigation on Achilleas Kallakis, a.k.a. Stefanos Kollakis, Alexander Lewis, a.k.a. Martin Lewis and Michael Karl Helmut and Mauritius Becker for violations of British criminal laws, “by conspiring amongst themselves to submit false and/or forged documents and/or statements to defraud Allied Irish Bank (AIB), an Irish company with branch registration in England and a UK subsidiary, AIB Group (UK) PLC, of money in the amount of around 700 million pounds, as well as alleged violations of British anti-money laundering laws.”

Records show that the crimes were allegedly committed between 2003 and 2007.

The SFO believes that Williams, alias Martin Lewis, violated UK money laundering laws by transferring illegally obtained funds of AIB to a network of accounts overseas and concealed the proceeds he obtained from the fraud by passing them to his wife, Ochavez, through her bank accounts in the Philippines.

The SFO added that Ochavez received cash deposits in a UK bank account during the period of the fraud even if she had not declared any income from employment in the UK since April 2005.

The SFO identified the subject bank accounts in the Philippines, both in the name of Ochavez, where proceeds of the alleged unlawful activities were transferred.

source: philstar.com